Advertising
law cases in California can be filed under a multitude of different
causes of action. This article seeks to discuss just some of the ways
in which advertising cases can be filed, and the type of cases which,
to a large extent, have not yet been pursued as fully as one would
expect.
Perhaps the first cause of action that comes to mind to use to obtain a
remedy for an individual harmed by advertising would be a cause of
action for fraud. To take a fictional example, say an advertiser, and
by virtue of their advertisement on a television program on a certain
station, advertises that they have the cure for cancer, male baldness,
bad breath and being able to keep the weight off, all in one simple
drug or in their book.
The advertiser uses a spokesman, the advertiser uses a specific
television station, and in a relatively new twist in this age of the
internet, the advertiser also promotes his or her website which after
purchasing the drug or the book, the purchaser learns he must also
subscribe to the advertiser’s website either to learn additional
details or be kept up to date with side effects of the drug.
Even if the book or drug sold is sold at a price of $34.95, and even if
the internet subscription is even $10/month, this is not going to
amount to sufficient damages for an attorney to take the case on
contingency. And if the individual who bought the book or drug doesn’t
have tens of thousands of dollars to pursue such a case on his or her
own, the case may never be brought and the advertiser may simply go on
advertising his or her amazing product.
An action by the FCC against such an advertiser will be unlikely to
help the consumer. If the advertiser makes a deal with the FCC, while
such a settlement may be in the millions of dollars, the money will
simply go to the government and the advertiser will likely simply
promise never to make such advertisements again. In reality, the
advertiser may also find some new product to advertise or seek to
advertise it in a different way and one not covered by the settlement
with the FCC, such as by using 800 or 900 numbers.
Businesses or individuals harmed by network television affiliates
overcharging for their air time may also feel powerless to bring an
action for being excluded from the marketplace or being overcharged as
a result of price-fixing or monopolization.
What these examples have in common is that by virtue of class actions
and/or antitrust class actions, the claims of these individuals can be
made on behalf of a class of similar damaged individuals or entities.
With hundreds or thousands and in some cases, millions of similarly
injured plaintiffs, the case, while increasing in complexity and cost,
can also become sufficiently attractive that one law firm, or multiple
law firms working in conjunction, are able to pursue such a case and
bring the advertiser to the bargaining table.
In the event the damages caused by the advertising are large enough or
specific enough against a single plaintiff such that a class action is
not needed or would not be appropriate, additional defendants may be
considered. In the case of the advertiser of the book or drug, if the
advice contained in the book or the drug not only was misleading but
caused serious bodily harm or death, the plaintiff may want to consider
a negligence action and consider whether the television network or the
spokesman also had some culpability for putting their name behind the
product. Where the television station or spokesman is sharing in the
profits from the book or drug in exchange for advertising dollars, this
may especially warrant consideration.
If you have a situation in which the advertising practices of an
individual, entity or a television station are causing you or your
business harm, or are favoring your competitors to your disadvantage,
and you believe others have been similarly harmed or damaged, call your
advertising
law attorney.
Author Bio:Sebastian Gibson is a practicing personal injury
attorney represents clients throughout Southern California Lawyer from
his main offices in Rancho Mirage, representing
semi
Truck & Highway Accidents,
Litigation
/ International Law